• Subtitle

  The Internet is no longer fast enough for Google.

• Creators

  Erica Naone

Info for this Work

• More/Less

• Title

  The Slow-Motion Internet

  Title:

  Save Cancel

• Subtitle

  The Internet is no longer fast enough for Google.

  Subtitle:

  Save Cancel

• Abstract

  The Internet is no longer fast enough for Google. To see why, try the Chrome netbook. It's a prototype device that exemplifies one of the company's visions for the future: the idea that we can do nearly all our computing online, accessing information anywhere on a whim. This netbook has a pared-down operating system that's essentially a powerful Web browser. It stores almost no files or software. Almost everything you can do on the device requires an Internet connection.

  Abstract: The Internet is no longer fast enough for Google. To see why, try the Chrome netbook. It's a prototype device that exemplifies one of the company's visions for the future: the idea that we can do nearly all our computing online, accessing information anywhere on a whim. This netbook has a pared-down operating system that's essentially a powerful Web browser. It stores almost no files or software. Almost everything you can do on the device requires an Internet connection.

  Save Cancel

• Keywords

  Google, Internet, World Wide Web, Web 3.0

  Keywords:

  Save Cancel

Structure

• More/Less

1. Introduction

   Name:

   Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

   Display heading in View/Output

   Save Cancel

   Are you sure you want to delete this element?

   Delete Cancel

2. Top Overview

   Name:

   Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

   Display heading in View/Output

   Save Cancel

   Are you sure you want to delete this element?

   Delete Cancel

   1. Overview 1

      Name:

      Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

      Display heading in View/Output

      Save Cancel

      Are you sure you want to delete this element?

      Delete Cancel

   2. Overview 2

      Name:

      Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

      Display heading in View/Output

      Save Cancel

      Are you sure you want to delete this element?

      Delete Cancel

      1. Last Overview

         Name:

         Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

         Display heading in View/Output

         Save Cancel

         Are you sure you want to delete this element?

         Delete Cancel

3. Initial Concept

   Name:

   Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

   Display heading in View/Output

   Save Cancel

   Are you sure you want to delete this element?

   Delete Cancel

4. Initial Concept

   Name:

   Type: Element Type 1 Element Type 2 Element Type 3 Element Type 4

   Display heading in View/Output

   Save Cancel

   Are you sure you want to delete this element?

   Delete Cancel

Versions

• Filter by Tag

• 3 Current

  • Custom Tag 1
  • Add Tag

  Feedback was added to this version 3 hours ago:

  View Cancel

  Are you sure you want to revert to this version?

  Continue Cancel

  Create a duplicate of this version:

  Type of Work: Work Type 1 (Default to Current) Work Type 2 Work Type 3 Work Type 4

  Title:

  Subtitle:

  Create Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this version?

  Delete Cancel

  Add a Tag to This Work:

  Select a Tag: Tag 1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4

  Create a Your Own Tag:

  Add Cancel

• 2 Mar 14, 3:15pm

  • Custom Tag 1
  • Custom Tag 2
  • Add Tag

  Are you sure you want to revert to this version?

  Continue Cancel

  Create a duplicate of this version:

  Type of Work: Work Type 1 (Default to Current) Work Type 2 Work Type 3 Work Type 4

  Title:

  Subtitle:

  Create Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this version?

  Delete Cancel

  Add a Tag to This Work:

  Select a Tag: Tag 1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4

  Create a Your Own Tag:

  Add Cancel

• 1 Mar 10, 5:20pm

  • Add Tag

  Feedback was added to this version Mar 11:

  View Cancel

  Are you sure you want to revert to this version?

  Continue Cancel

  Create a duplicate of this version:

  Type of Work: Work Type 1 (Default to Current) Work Type 2 Work Type 3 Work Type 4

  Title:

  Subtitle:

  Create Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this version?

  Delete Cancel

  Add a Tag to This Work:

  Select a Tag: Tag 1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4

  Create a Your Own Tag:

  Add Cancel

Rubric

• More/Less
• Print

• Thesis Statement or Research Question

  Rating: 0 to 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  The writer introduces the topic and its relevance to LIS; engages the reader and lays the foundation for the direction of the paper with a clearly stated thesis or research question. (Weight: 1/3)

• Content Depth

  Rating: 0 to 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  Thoughtful in-depth presentation of the topic; ideas are clearly articulated and focused with detail; cites to sources when specific statements are made. (Weight: 1/3)

• Analysis and Conclusions

  Rating: 0 to 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  Conclusions follow clearly from information presented; analysis is substantive and thoughtful. The writer makes insightful conclusions based on analysis and synthesis of the information that address the stated topic or thesis. (Weight: 1/3)

Results

• More/Less

Review This Work

• More/Less

• Thesis Statement or Research Question

  Rating (0 to 8):

  of 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  Explanation:

• Content Depth

  Rating (0 to 8):

  of 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  Explanation:

• Analysis and Conclusions

  Rating (0 to 8):

  of 8 Details

  1. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis length requirement is not met.
  2. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  3. Major flaws in grammar. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  4. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis fails to discuss several key concepts.
  5. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is good, but fails to discuss a few key concepts.
  6. Minor grammatical errors. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  7. Perfect grammar. Research and analysis is very good, but could be more robust.
  8. Perfect grammar. Excellent research and analysis.

  Explanation:

Save Preview & Submit

Submit for Review

Submitting will save the current version and send it to reviewers.

Annotations

• More/Less

• The internet is no longer fast enough

  • John Smith made a comment:

    I think this is a strong concept. Could be used as the title or lead?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • You:

    I was thinking the same thing. I could just say "the internet's too slow." What do you think?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • John Smith:

    Nah, I like how "no longer" sounds.

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  Comment:

  Add Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this annotation?

  Delete Cancel

• my favorite streaming radio station

  • John Smith made a comment:

    I think this is a strong concept. Could be used as the title or lead?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • You:

    I was thinking the same thing. I could just say "the internet's too slow." What do you think?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • John Smith:

    Nah, I like how "no longer" sounds.

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  Comment:

  Add Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this annotation?

  Delete Cancel

• Before long I gave up using network protocols

  • John Smith Suggested a Change:

    Grammatical Correction: I think this is a strong concept. Could be used as the title or lead?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • You:

    I was thinking the same thing. I could just say "the internet's too slow." What do you think?

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  • John Smith:

    Nah, I like how "no longer" sounds.

    Type: Flag Type 1 Flag Type 2 Flag Type 3

    Comment:

    Flag

  Comment:

  Add Cancel

  Are you sure you want to delete this annotation?

  Delete Cancel

Check

• More/Less

• fore

  Did you mean…

  • for

  Are you sure you want to delete this item?

  Delete Cancel

• whatt

  Spelling

  • what
  • watt
  • wait
  • want
  • wart

  Are you sure you want to delete this item?

  Delete Cancel

• When did it hapen.

  Spelling

  • happen

  Punctuation

  • When did it hapen?

  Are you sure you want to delete this item?

  Delete Cancel

Start Checker